Younger adults were more likely to use first-person singular pronouns e. In contrast, older adults are more positive in their profiles and focus more on connectedness and relationships to others. Enjoy affordable access to over 18 million articles from more than 15, peer-reviewed journals. Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15, scientific journals.
See the journals in your area.
Read Article. Download. Share Full Text for Free beta. Web of Science. Let us know here. Download the app today and start finding your match! AgeMatch app is currently owned by SuccessfulMatch. Phone: 1- If you have any legal issue, please contact our legal council, one of the best in San Francisco. Reviews Review Policy. View details. Flag as inappropriate. Visit website. We first examined descriptive statistics for the proportions of words people of different ages used in their dating profiles.
We also generated illustrative figures portraying the most common words.
For that digital dating online profile content of older and younger adults amusing piece consider
We then turned to hypothesis testing using ordinary least squares regression. The outcome variables in this study were the proportion of words fitting each of the 12 categories in the LIWC analyses.
The LIWC categories were all positively skewed due to the number of zero values i. The pattern of findings was similar after applying the transformations. For ease of interpretation, findings are presented using the untransformed LIWC category data. - teknoderas.com variable was age, treated as a continuous variable. We also included gender. One significant interaction was found in the category of positive emotion, such that women had higher mean proportions of positive emotion words than men at all ages, with women showing a slightly steeper linear increase with age than men.
These differences likely reflect disparities in instructions provided by the websites and the fact that one website charges daters to contact a potential romantic partner and the other allows contacts for free.
Due to the number of significant t -tests, we adjusted for the effect of website in our analyses by treating it as a dummy coded covariate. Contrasts revealed significant differences between White and all other ethnic groups in four of the six significant ANOVAs.
That digital dating online profile content of older and younger adults question interesting, too
Of the 12 ANOVA tests related to geographic region, only two were significant family and positive emotion. Because the differences were not theoretically meaningful, we did not consider geographic region in subsequent analyses.
Jul 26, As such, online profiles provide a unique opportunity to examine similarities and differences in younger and older adults' self-presentations when seeking a dating partner. Self-presentation plays a central role in finding dating partners; potential partners use this information to decide whether to start a relationship (Derlega, Winstead, Wong, & Greenspan, ).Cited by: Jul 26, Digital Dating: Online Profile Content of Older and Younger Adults July 26, / in Marriage, Social Engagement / by admin Older adults are utilizing online dating websites in . Jun 12, AgeMatch is the #1 age gap dating app dedicated to helping develop relationships between older men dating younger women,and older women dating younger men. The very first, most effective, and largest app for age gap dating that exists today, Age Match is committed to finding love for people who want a relationship with someone significantly older or younger than they are themselves.
Frequency of word use is evident in descriptive statistics see Table 1 and via word-clouds. The word-cloud technique illustrates the most commonly used words across the entire sample and in each of the age groups. The word-cloud program automatically excludes certain words, including articles a, and, the and prepositions to, with, on.
The remaining content words are scaled in size relative to their frequency, creating an intuitive portrait of the most prevalent content words across the sample Wordle, Figure 1 shows the 20 most common content words used in the entire sample. Thus, the most common words were similar across age groups. Figure 2 shows the next 30 most common content words in the youngest and oldest age groups. By removing the first 20 common content words across the sample, we illustrate heterogeneity in the dating profiles.
Next 30 most common words in the youngest and oldest age groups after subtracting the 20 most common words from Figure 1. To test hypotheses, the percentage of words from the dating profile that fit each LIWC category served as the dependent variables in regressions.
We examined age and gender as independent variables as well as adjusting for website and ethnicity. Hypothesis 1: Older age will be associated with a higher percentage of words in the following categories: first-person plural pronouns, family, friends, health, and positive emotion. Findings largely supported Hypothesis 1 see Table 2.
Four of the five regressions revealed a significant main effect for age, such that as the age of the profile writer increased, the percentage of words in the category increased in the following categories: first-person plural, friends, health, and positive emotion.
We found no significant age effect for the proportion of words in the family category. Hypothesis 2: Younger age will be associated with a higher percentage of words in the following categories: first-person singular pronouns, work, achievement, money, attractiveness, sexuality, and negative emotion. We found mixed support for Hypothesis 2 see Table 3. Four of the seven regressions revealed a pattern consistent with hypotheses, such that as the age of the profile writer increased, the percentage of words in the category decreased.
Younger adults showed higher percentages of words in the first-person singular, work, achievement, and negative emotion categories. The model for the category of money showed a significant main effect of age in the opposite direction of predictions, such that as age increased, so did the percentage of words in the money category. The models for attractiveness and sexuality categories did not show significant effects of age.
Regressions also revealed significant gender differences in the proportion of words in relevant LIWC categories. For example, women had a higher percentage of words in the first-person singular category, whereas men had a higher percentage of words in the first-person plural category.
Men had higher proportions of words in the work category. Women had higher proportions of words in the categories of friends, family, health, sexuality, and positive emotion. No significant gender differences were found in the categories of achievement, money, attractiveness, or negative emotion.
Older adults are increasingly involved in dating. Recent years have seen a proliferation of romantic relationships formed via the Internet, and older adults are increasingly turning online to find romantic partners. The ubiquity of dating websites as a means to find a relationship provides scholars with a unique opportunity to examine dating strategies and motivations in the context in which they actually occur. This study is the largest examination of age differences in dating profiles to date; we collected profile text from 4, adults across the United States.
This study revealed similarities in the most widely used words in the dating profiles, with a focus on affection and affiliation love, like and companionship.
May 04, In "kittenfishing," however, someone isn't exorbitantly lying in their online dating profile, they're just stretching the truth. The most basic version of this involves posting old or heavily altered photos, or lying about weight or height, so that the person who walks into the bar only vaguely resembles the person you matched with.
Nonetheless, the questions were open ended, and findings suggest that adults of all ages may share predilections in seeking affection in romantic partnerships. Though the current study revealed similarities in profile content across ages, these systematic analyses revealed age differences consistent with predictions across a variety of key content areas.
Self-presentations reflected goals in a dating context and more broadly reflected the motivations of individuals at different life stages. Profiles revealed differences in how younger and older adults approach finding a mate. Findings generally supported the hypotheses and were consistent with prior research on sociocultural motivations. Younger adults are focused on establishing themselves and their identities in an adult world Arnett,and those goals translated to self-focused self-presentations.
With regard to a focus on self versus others, older adults may feel more connected to existing relationships and the needs of others Blieszner, Gender differences in evolutionary motivations across life stages also were evident, with older and younger men mentioning their work, whereas older and younger women focusing more on sexuality.
Findings regarding achievements and status only partially supported the hypotheses. Surprisingly, older adults were more likely to mention money in their profiles than younger adults.
Some research suggests that older women are particularly concerned with the income of potential dating partners, to avoid entering a relationship that becomes a financial strain William et al. Older adults were also more likely to mention health, which likely reflects the greater relevance of health to the identities of older adults Levy, Finally, gender differences revealed that women are more likely to focus on the self as well as themes related to positive emotion, friends, family, health, and sex.
Men focused more on others and occupation, as evidenced by higher percentage of words in the first-person plural and work categories.
LIWC category Total sample aged years (n = 4,) Young adulthood aged years (n = 1,) Early midlife aged years (n = 1,) Late midlife aged years (n = 1,) Late life aged 65 and older (n = 1,) First-person plural (we, us, our). In this day and age, more and more young people are turning to online dating sites and mobile phone applications in search of love and intimacy. From the launch of the first online dating site in , to the invention of modern social networking dating sites in , online dating has . Jul 16, Seniors often hesitate to try online dating because they don't feel comfortable on the platform. It's too abbreviated. After living a full life - traveling the world, having a career, raising kids - a small text-box labeled My Story can seem laughably inadequate for singles over
The current study was limited by a dearth of information regarding the profile writers; we could not examine differences in dating profiles by education level, occupation, religion, or prior marital status.
For example, the youngest profile writers may be in the process of completing their education and have less income than the older profile writers.
Furthermore, we were unable to identify how prior marriage may alter dating self-presentations. Previous work using data from the internet has revealed that it is possible to reconstruct identities with even a limited number of background variables Parry, ; Zimmer, Indeed, the data were obtained from public websites, but without participant consent. As such, ethical use of ecologically valid data constrained the number of background characteristics included in this study of age differences.
Future research may consider potential associations involving additional variables by utilizing surveys or experimental designs and obtaining informed consent from the participants. Differences between the two major websites suggest that distinct types of people may choose different dating websites. Yet, studies of online dating profiles typically sample from only a single website e. The websites provided different instructions for the open-ended sections and had different fee structures.
Future research should consider sampling from a greater variety of websites to learn more about motivations for dating partners. Furthermore, the literature has rarely addressed ethnic differences in dating motivations or behaviors. Thus, we had no a priori hypotheses regarding ethnic differences in our sample. Future research may benefit from a closer examination of ethnic differences in dating motivations and behaviors.
Finally, future research might examine whether the content of online dating profiles predicts outcomes, such as being contacted for dates, number of dates, or eventual relationship satisfaction or stability.
Some research suggests that specific components of profiles may play a role in dating success. This is encouraging news for older adults, as the current study revealed a general picture of older adults as more positive and less self-focused in their dating profiles than younger adults.
In summary, similarities and differences are evident in the self-presentation strategies older and younger adults use when seeking new relationships in an online context. As the ubiquity of seeking dates online increases, older adults are utilizing this context as a means to find romantic partners.
Adults of all ages may share the desires of affiliation and love when seeking a partner. However, subtle differences in these online self-presentations may reflect the changing motivations that accompany aging more broadly.
We are grateful to Lisa Neff and Jamie Pennebaker for providing helpful feedback on earlier drafts of this manuscript.
Digital dating online profile content of older and younger adults
Alterovitz S. Mendelsohn G.
Partner preferences across the life span: Online dating by older adults. Psychology and Aging24- Google Scholar. Relationship goals of middle-aged, young-old, and old-old Internet daters: An analysis of online personal ads.
You talent digital dating online profile content of older and younger adults god knows! good
Journal of Aging Studies27- Psychological well-being in mid to late life: The role of generativity development and parent-child relationships across the lifespan.
International Journal of Behavioral Development30- Arnett J. Emerging adulthood.
Dating Apps Are STUNTING Young Men
A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. The American Psychologist55- Birditt K. Fingerman K.
Dec 01, Older adults are utilizing online dating websites in increasing numbers. Adults of different ages may share motivations for companionship and affection, but dating profiles may reveal differences in adults' goals. Theories addressing age-related changes in motivation suggest that younger adults are likely to emphasize themselves, achievements, attractiveness, and teknoderas.com by: Feb 26, Tinder is a free dating app with a lot of perks to offer young singles. Over 50of Tinder members are between 18 and 25 years old. You can create a Tinder profile instantly by connecting to your social media accounts, and the app encourages members to stay active, send GIFs, and engage in multiple flirty conversations to up their odds of meeting the right person online. Nov 17, Digital Dating: Online Profile Content of Older and Younger Adults Digital Dating: Online Profile Content of Older and Younger Adults Davis, Eden M.; Fingerman, Karen L. AbstractObjectives:Older adults are utilizing online dating websites in increasing numbers. Adults of different ages may share motivations for companionship and affection, but dating profiles .
Blieszner R. Personal Relationships131 - Brown L. The kinkeeping connection: Continuity, crisis and consensus. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships8- Buss D. Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences121 - The evolution of desire rev. New York : Basic Books.
Google Preview. Calasanti T.
Was digital dating online profile content of older and younger adults that
Diversity among late-life couples. Generations3110 - Carr D. The desire to date and remarry among older widows and widowers.
Journal of Marriage and Family66- Carstensen L. Mikels J. At the intersection of emotion and cognition aging and the positivity effect. Current Directions in Psychological Science14- Charles S. Social and emotional aging. Annual Review of Psychology61- Cherlin A. The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Coupland J. Styling selves and relationships in overs dating advertisements. Journal of Communication509 - DeAndrea D.